In recent months, the topic of the materiality matrix (and its calculation based on the double materiality diagram) in the context of ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards) has become the subject of numerous discussions and inquiries. Many experts are considering how best to approach materiality analysis within the ESRS framework and whether the traditional materiality matrix is appropriate in this case.
The most common challenges in the context of the materiality matrix in ESRS
One of the most common challenges is the impracticality of the materiality matrix in the context of ESRS. These standards do not include two independent criteria, as was the case in previous GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards. In ESRS, these variables are interdependent and encompass many additional criteria, making the traditional materiality matrix inappropriate.
Moreover, placing all sustainability topics on the matrix creates difficulties in understanding and readability of the results, especially when the number of topics exceeds 100. ESRS neither requires nor mentions the need for a materiality matrix, further confirming its impracticality.
What doesn’t work and what does work
What doesn’t work:
Materiality matrices as a method of visualizing results are considered misleading and impractical in the context of ESRS. The traditional matrix, based on two variables – significance to stakeholders and impact on the company – does not capture the full complexity of the analyzed topics. In the case of ESRS, where variables are interdependent and more complex, using a matrix can lead to a misrepresentation of data. Attempts to place topics in four quadrants often result in issues with clarity and interpretation of results. The lack of hierarchy within the matrix makes positioning topics ambiguous and can mislead readers.
What works:
Alternative visualization methods, such as Venn diagrams and topic lists, can better reflect the complexity of sustainability topics and are much more practical. A Venn diagram showing material topics for impact, finance, and both categories, with an additional indication of the number of impacts, risks, and opportunities, provides a clearer picture. Lists with a clear division into material and non-material topics and their characteristics (positive/negative impacts, risks, opportunities) are easier to understand and interpret.
Suggestions for Measuring/Calculating
Key approaches to measuring and calculating Materiality in the context of ESRS:
- Categorization:
- Classify sustainability topics based on their materiality for finance and impact. Topics can be classified as material for financial reasons, impact, or both, making it easier to identify priorities.
- Example: If a topic is important for both stakeholders and has a significant impact on the company, it should be classified as material for both categories.
- Visualization of results:
- Use diagrams or lists with a division into material and non-material topics and their characteristics. A Venn diagram showing material topics for impact, finance, and both categories is clearer and more practical.
- Example: A Venn diagram can visualize which topics are significant from the perspective of environmental impact, finance, or both, helping to better understand their importance.
- Numbering and weighting:
- Add counters that show the number of impacts, risks, and opportunities for each topic and their distribution into positive and negative. Counters can indicate how many positive and negative impacts a topic has, helping to assess its materiality.
- Example: Counters can show that a topic has three negative impacts and two positive ones, providing a fuller picture of its materiality.
Podsumowanie
In the context of ESRS, using a materiality matrix is impractical and misleading. Instead, it is recommended to use alternative visualization methods, such as Venn diagrams and lists, which better capture the complexity of the analyzed topics. This allows companies to present the results of their materiality analyses more effectively, contributing to better understanding and transparency of their actions.
If you need support or are interested in the topic of materiality in the context of ESRS, please contact us. Our team of experts is ready to help develop effective strategies and tools for materiality analysis.
